Kant vs. Hume: Comparing Enlightenment Ethics
Classified in Philosophy and ethics
Written on in English with a size of 3.08 KB
Kant and Hume, both prominent authors of the 18th-century Enlightenment, held differing ethical views. The comparison between them is often presented as follows: Kant's ethics are formal, while Hume's are material. Kant focuses on intentions, while Hume emphasizes ends. Kant's ethics are rooted in virtue, while Hume's are concerned with happiness.
Kant argued that reason should determine the will. Conversely, Hume posited that feelings dictate the will, informing us about what is good or bad. Hume famously stated, "Reason is the slave of passions," highlighting that reason alone does not drive behavior. Furthermore, their conceptions of reason and feelings diverge significantly.
For Kant, morality cannot be based on feelings but must be grounded... Continue reading "Kant vs. Hume: Comparing Enlightenment Ethics" »