Notes, summaries, assignments, exams, and problems for Law & Jurisprudence

Sort by
Subject
Level

Public Safety, Privacy, and Justice: Debating Juries and Surveillance

Classified in Law & Jurisprudence

Written on in English with a size of 2.43 KB

The Jury System: Pros and Cons

In criminal trials, particularly those seen on US TV, we watch juries struggling to decide guilt. However, in reality, some countries use juries while others do not. Are juries a good idea?

Arguments for Professional Judges

On the one hand, there are advantages to leaving important legal decisions to a professional judge. Jurors may not understand some aspects of a trial, such as complex legal arguments or forensic evidence. In addition, they might make hurried decisions because they've been forced to interrupt their lives for a trial and are impatient to return to their jobs and families.

Arguments for Trial by Jury

On the other hand, trial by jury means that defendants are judged by a group of their equals. Jurors... Continue reading "Public Safety, Privacy, and Justice: Debating Juries and Surveillance" »

Essential Legal Terms & US Federalism Explained

Classified in Law & Jurisprudence

Written on in English with a size of 3.56 KB

Key Legal Terms Defined

Allegation:
A claim or assertion that someone has done something illegal or wrong.
Fugitive:
A person who has escaped from custody or is in hiding to avoid arrest.
Appeal:
A legal proceeding before a judge or other decision-making body.
Custody:
The legal control or guardianship of someone or something, often implying parental control.
Jurisdiction:
The authority of a court or legal body to hear and decide cases within a specific area.
Appellate:
Related to appeals in higher courts; reviews decisions.
Death Sentence:
A legal order authorizing the execution of a person.
Expropriation:
The act of a government taking private property for public use.
Felony:
A serious crime, such as murder or burglary, typically punishable by imprisonment
... Continue reading "Essential Legal Terms & US Federalism Explained" »

Death Row and Parole in the US: Statistics and Analysis

Classified in Law & Jurisprudence

Written on in English with a size of 3.19 KB

Death Row Demographics and Trends

  • Southern states account for 55% of death row inmates.
  • Approximately 3,300 individuals are on death row.
  • Over 100 death sentences are issued each year.
  • More than 25 executions occur annually.
  • Executions declined between 1935 and 1970.
  • Inmate riots have remained stable over the past 30 years.
  • About 56% of those executed are white, while 35% are Black.
  • The percentage of Black Americans on death row is disproportionately high.
  • The race of the victim is the largest factor in death penalty cases.
  • 30 states have the death penalty.
  • Electrocution is still used in Nebraska.
  • Executing mentally ill individuals is considered cruel and unusual punishment under the 8th Amendment.
  • As of 2020, only 9% of inmates have a college education.
... Continue reading "Death Row and Parole in the US: Statistics and Analysis" »

Key Legal Concepts: Torts, Dismissal & Offenses

Classified in Law & Jurisprudence

Written on in English with a size of 4.89 KB

Legal Comparisons

Negligence vs. Intentional Tort

Negligence and intentional torts differ primarily in the mindset of the individual causing harm. Negligence occurs when someone fails to exercise reasonable care, often resulting in unintentional harm. In contrast, intentional torts, like assault or battery, involve deliberate actions intended to harm another person.

Strict Liability vs. Negligence

Strict liability and negligence share the goal of holding individuals accountable for harm caused, but their requirements for proving fault differ. Negligence requires proving that the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care, while strict liability does not require any proof of fault.

Defamation vs. Nuisance

Defamation and nuisance are distinct torts... Continue reading "Key Legal Concepts: Torts, Dismissal & Offenses" »

Charles Manson: The Criminal Mind Behind the Family

Classified in Law & Jurisprudence

Written on in English with a size of 2.47 KB

Charles Manson: Cult Leader and Criminal

Charles Milles Manson (born November 12, 1934) was an American criminal who led what became known as the Manson Family, a quasi-commune that arose in California in the late 1960s.

The Tate/LaBianca Murders

Manson was found guilty of conspiracy to commit the infamous Tate/LaBianca murders, carried out by members of the group at his instruction. He was convicted of the murders themselves through the joint-responsibility rule, which makes each member of a conspiracy guilty of crimes their fellow conspirators commit in furtherance of the conspiracy's objective.

"Helter Skelter" and Apocalyptic Visions

Manson is often associated with the phrase "Helter Skelter," a term taken from the Beatles' song of that name.... Continue reading "Charles Manson: The Criminal Mind Behind the Family" »

Legal Acts: Classification and Vices Affecting Validity

Classified in Law & Jurisprudence

Written on in English with a size of 3.16 KB

Classification of Legal Acts

Legal acts can be classified based on various criteria:

  • Positive or Negative: Acts necessary to conduct an action or omission of a right to start or finish.
  • Unilateral: When the will of one person is sufficient to form the act.
  • Bilateral: When two or more people are required to form the act.
  • Acts During Life (Inter Vivos): Those whose effectiveness does not depend on the death of those whose will they emanate from.
  • Testamentary Provisions (Mortis Causa): Those effects that produce after death.
  • Onerous: Acts in which the provision of one party corresponds to a consideration from the other.

Vices of Legal Acts: Causes for Invalidation

Vices are causes for which legal acts lose their efficacy or validity. Some of these include:... Continue reading "Legal Acts: Classification and Vices Affecting Validity" »

Jurisdiction in the European Union: A Comprehensive Summary

Classified in Law & Jurisprudence

Written on in English with a size of 3.29 KB

Jurisdiction in the European Union

1. Relation with Other Legal Instruments

1.1 Other Specific EU Legal Instruments

Does not affect specific matters.

1.2 Brussels Convention

Superseded by the Brussels Regulation. References to the Convention should be to the Regulation.

1.3 International Conventions

Supersedes existing treaties, but treaties retain validity where not superseded. The Brussels Regulation (Regulation 44/2001) does not affect specific treaties. The Regulation shall not affect treaties prior to its entry into force.

2. Scope of Application

2.1 Time

March 2002

2.2 Geographical Scope

All EU members except Denmark (Denmark joined in 2005).

2.3 Material Scope

Civil and commercial matters (excluding revenue, customs, and administrative matters). Does... Continue reading "Jurisdiction in the European Union: A Comprehensive Summary" »

Preliminary vs. Provisional Measures in Litigation

Classified in Law & Jurisprudence

Written on in English with a size of 2.44 KB

Difference Between Preliminary and Provisional Measures

Preliminary Measures

Preliminary measures allow the future plaintiff to gather information needed to establish the facts of the case. The main requirement is demonstrating the necessity of specific information for the proceeding to establish the case in the complaint.

Two types of information-gathering measures exist:

  • Testimony and Oral Testimony of a Person: To obtain knowledge held by someone.
  • Submission of Documents: To access relevant documents.

To request such measures, one must demonstrate a just cause and relevance to the case.

Provisional Measures

Provisional measures, requested by a future plaintiff, aim to prevent risks of a future positive judgment not being enforced. The purpose is... Continue reading "Preliminary vs. Provisional Measures in Litigation" »

Inchoate Crimes: Conspiracy, Attempt, Solicitation, and More

Classified in Law & Jurisprudence

Written on in English with a size of 2.98 KB

Inchoate Crimes: An Overview

Definition

Inchoate crimes, also known as incomplete crimes, are actions that are not crimes in themselves but occur in conjunction with other crimes. Examples include attempted murder and conspiracy to commit robbery.

Types of Inchoate Crimes

Conspiracy

Conspiracy is the oldest inchoate crime. It involves an agreement between two or more people to commit an unlawful act. The purpose of conspiracy laws is to prevent and punish criminal partnerships from attempting substantive offenses.

Elements of Conspiracy:

  1. Agreement between two or more people
  2. Intent to commit a crime
  3. Overt act by any co-conspirator in furtherance of the conspiracy

The overt act need not be criminal but only needs to carry the project forward.

Conspiracy... Continue reading "Inchoate Crimes: Conspiracy, Attempt, Solicitation, and More" »

Rule of Law and Sovereignty in Democratic States

Classified in Law & Jurisprudence

Written on in English with a size of 2.72 KB

The Rule of Law in Democratic States

Diamond and Morlino highlight the rule of law as the cornerstone of any democratic state. A robust legal system prevents exploitation and protects citizens from government overreach. In states where the law is respected, citizens enjoy free and fair elections, participate in shaping laws and policies, and hold their government accountable. A law-abiding government, in turn, respects public opinion, protects equal rights for all, and remains answerable for any misconduct across its executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Conversely, without the rule of law, democratic institutions weaken, citizen participation diminishes, and corruption flourishes. Many developing nations struggle to establish a... Continue reading "Rule of Law and Sovereignty in Democratic States" »