Judicial Presumptions, Affirmative Defenses, and Evidence Admissibility
Classified in Law & Jurisprudence
Written on in
English with a size of 3.75 KB
Judicial Presumptions: Conclusive and Rebuttable
A judicial presumption is a logical inference made by a judge where, once a fact has been established, it is very likely that another fact is true. This is a type of circumstantial evidence, representing the mental activity of inferring the truth of one fact based on another.
It comprises three essential elements: an ascertained fact, a logical link, and a presumed fact. Courts are expected to apply presumptions during the evaluation of evidence.
Presumptions can be categorized into two main types:
- Legal Presumptions: Established directly in the text of the law, these may be either conclusive or rebuttable.
- Judicial Presumptions: Created ad hoc by the court in consideration of the specific circumstances