Material vs. Formal Ethics, Social Origins, and Political Philosophy
Classified in Philosophy and ethics
Written on in
English with a size of 5.51 KB
Material and Formal Ethics
In the realm of media, material ethics considers actions as good or bad depending on the aim pursued. Immanuel Kant rejects this view because:
- Its imperatives are not universal.
- They are hypothetical, holding value only if we accept the good they seek as inherently good.
- They are heteronomous, meaning that humans determine what is good or bad.
In contrast, formal ethics views behaviors as inherently good or bad in themselves.
- It does not establish any ultimate good that humans should pursue.
- It merely dictates how we should act to behave morally, not the specific acts themselves.
Thus, moral principles are universal, necessary, and immutable.
Natural Law vs. Positivism
Natural Law is a legal tradition within the philosophy... Continue reading "Material vs. Formal Ethics, Social Origins, and Political Philosophy" »