Notes, summaries, assignments, exams, and problems for Law & Jurisprudence

Key Mergers & Acquisitions

• Etihad Airways and Jet Airways
• Sun Pharma and Ranbaxy
• Wal-Mart and Flipkart

Section 26 (1) of the Competition Act

On receipt of a reference from the Central/State Government, statutory authority, or upon its knowledge/information (under section 19), if the Commission believes a prima facie case exists, it shall direct the Director General to investigate.

Relevant Cases

• CCI v. Steel Authority of India Ltd

Section 27(b): Penalties

The Commission may impose penalties, not exceeding 10% of the average turnover for the last three financial years, upon enterprises party to anti-competitive agreements or abuse of dominance.

Relevant Cases

• Excel Crop Care Ltd v. CCI

Section 3(3): Anti-Competitive Agreements

Agreements that cause or... Continue reading "Understanding Competition Law in India: Key Cases and Concepts" »

Distinguishing Similar English Words

Understanding the subtle differences between similar words can greatly improve your English vocabulary and communication skills. Here's a breakdown of several commonly confused words:

Words Implying Falsehood

• FALSE: Not real.
• SPURIOUS: Not real.
• COUNTERFEIT: Made in close imitation of something else, always intended to deceive, especially of money and documents.
• FAKE: Made in close imitation of something else, always intended to deceive.
• BOGUS: Made in close imitation of something else, implying a negative value judgment.
• PHONY: Not real or true, always intended to deceive, implying a negative value judgment and arousing suspicion.
• MOCK: Made in close imitation of something else, intended as a substitute for the

The Shah Bano Case: A Landmark Indian Divorce Controversy

The Shah Bano case (1985 AIR 945, 1985 SCC (2) 556) was a controversial divorce lawsuit in India. Shah Bano, a 62-year-old Muslim woman and mother of five from Indore, Madhya Pradesh, was divorced by her husband in 1978 and subsequently denied alimony. This case sparked considerable debate about the application of different civil codes for different religions, particularly for Muslims in India.

The case led the Rajiv Gandhi government to pass the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986. This act diluted the Supreme Court's secular judgment and effectively denied destitute Muslim divorcees the right to alimony from their former husbands. The Shah Bano case generated significant... Continue reading "Shah Bano Case: Divorce, Alimony, and the Uniform Civil Code Debate" »

1 .- Concept D ° Subjective:

- Law in the objective sense is a set of legal rules governing the conduct of men

- Law in the subjective sense is contained in the substantive law (as when speaking of one or the other is because they look different aspects), is the faculty that has a subject to perform specific behavior, or refrain from it or require other The subject line of duty, serves to make, do and demand.

- These two concepts are related, since the definition of D ° objective is obtained for the individual right that could be formulated as follows: Power to act to satisfy their own interests guaranteed by law.

- There are some rights that are exercised without the consent, as the inherent rights (HR)

- We must make it clear that the... Continue reading "Subjective Rights" »

Uniform Civil Code in India

A common civil code, popularly known as the Uniform Civil Code (UCC), is a long-standing unresolved debate in independent India. This debate stems from Article 44 of the Indian Constitution, contained in Part 4 (Directive Principles of State Policy), which states the state shall endeavor to secure for the citizens a Uniform Civil Code throughout the territory of India. Here, the term Uniform Civil Code (UCC) implies a set of common laws governing marriage, divorce, adoption, inheritance, and other such familial matters which would be applicable to all Indians, irrespective of their religion. Today, the members of each religious community follow their own respective sets of civil laws based on their religious history... Continue reading "Uniform Civil Code in India: History and the Shah Bano Case" »

The Jury System: Pros and Cons

In criminal trials, particularly those seen on US TV, we watch juries struggling to decide guilt. However, in reality, some countries use juries while others do not. Are juries a good idea?

Arguments for Professional Judges

On the one hand, there are advantages to leaving important legal decisions to a professional judge. Jurors may not understand some aspects of a trial, such as complex legal arguments or forensic evidence. In addition, they might make hurried decisions because they've been forced to interrupt their lives for a trial and are impatient to return to their jobs and families.

Arguments for Trial by Jury

On the other hand, trial by jury means that defendants are judged by a group of their equals. Jurors... Continue reading "Public Safety, Privacy, and Justice: Debating Juries and Surveillance" »

Death Row Demographics and Trends

• Southern states account for 55% of death row inmates.
• Approximately 3,300 individuals are on death row.
• Over 100 death sentences are issued each year.
• More than 25 executions occur annually.
• Executions declined between 1935 and 1970.
• Inmate riots have remained stable over the past 30 years.
• About 56% of those executed are white, while 35% are Black.
• The percentage of Black Americans on death row is disproportionately high.
• The race of the victim is the largest factor in death penalty cases.
• 30 states have the death penalty.
• Electrocution is still used in Nebraska.
• Executing mentally ill individuals is considered cruel and unusual punishment under the 8th Amendment.
• As of 2020, only 9% of inmates have a college education.

Legal Comparisons

Negligence vs. Intentional Tort

Negligence and intentional torts differ primarily in the mindset of the individual causing harm. Negligence occurs when someone fails to exercise reasonable care, often resulting in unintentional harm. In contrast, intentional torts, like assault or battery, involve deliberate actions intended to harm another person.

Strict Liability vs. Negligence

Strict liability and negligence share the goal of holding individuals accountable for harm caused, but their requirements for proving fault differ. Negligence requires proving that the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care, while strict liability does not require any proof of fault.

Defamation vs. Nuisance

Defamation and nuisance are distinct torts... Continue reading "Key Legal Concepts: Torts, Dismissal & Offenses" »

Jurisdiction in the European Union

1. Relation with Other Legal Instruments

1.1 Other Specific EU Legal Instruments

Does not affect specific matters.

1.2 Brussels Convention

Superseded by the Brussels Regulation. References to the Convention should be to the Regulation.

1.3 International Conventions

Supersedes existing treaties, but treaties retain validity where not superseded. The Brussels Regulation (Regulation 44/2001) does not affect specific treaties. The Regulation shall not affect treaties prior to its entry into force.

2. Scope of Application

2.1 Time

March 2002

2.2 Geographical Scope

All EU members except Denmark (Denmark joined in 2005).

2.3 Material Scope

Civil and commercial matters (excluding revenue, customs, and administrative matters). Does... Continue reading "Jurisdiction in the European Union: A Comprehensive Summary" »

Difference Between Preliminary and Provisional Measures

Preliminary Measures

Preliminary measures allow the future plaintiff to gather information needed to establish the facts of the case. The main requirement is demonstrating the necessity of specific information for the proceeding to establish the case in the complaint.

Two types of information-gathering measures exist:

• Testimony and Oral Testimony of a Person: To obtain knowledge held by someone.
• Submission of Documents: To access relevant documents.

To request such measures, one must demonstrate a just cause and relevance to the case.

Provisional Measures

Provisional measures, requested by a future plaintiff, aim to prevent risks of a future positive judgment not being enforced. The purpose is... Continue reading "Preliminary vs. Provisional Measures in Litigation" »