Performance Appraisal Systems: Techniques, Methods, and Common Errors

Classified in Other subjects

Written at on English with a size of 3.24 KB.

Performance Appraisal Systems

Many companies establish methods to improve employee performance and correct errors. Performance appraisal systems are well-established in organizations. Information gathered by these systems is used to decide wage adjustments, promotions, and training. Managing and evaluating performance remains a challenge for most managers. Performance management is the process of linking individual or group performance with the main strategic mission and values.

Objectives of Performance Management Systems

  • Motivate Performance: Employee motivation and performance are key factors for business success. Owners and managers strive for good performance.
  • Aid Continuous Improvement: Performance management systems help identify areas for improvement and track progress.
  • Help Individuals Develop Skills: Managers need to encourage employees to take ownership of their jobs and develop new skills.
  • Building a Performance Culture: Creating a performance culture requires a systematic approach to managing the performance of the organization, teams, and individuals.
  • Determining Promotions: Identifying the best candidates for promotion is crucial. Internal hires offer the advantage of company knowledge and reduced ramp-up time.
  • Eliminating Poor Performance: Individuals can be categorized into high, medium, and poor performers. Poor performance must be addressed due to its negative effects.
  • Help Implement Business Strategy: Every business should have written goals. Goals are only effective if people are responsible for achieving them.

Reasons for Performance Management System Failure

  • Incorrect Employee Evaluation: Unfair or biased evaluations can undermine the system.
  • Unconstructive Feedback: Feedback should be specific, actionable, and focused on improvement.

Performance Appraisal Techniques

360-Degree Feedback

This appraisal technique provides feedback on employee performance from multiple sources, including subordinates, peers, and supervisors. The increasing use of 360-degree feedback is due to:

  • The need for cost-effective alternatives to assessment centers.
  • The need for continuous measurement in continuous improvement efforts.
  • The need for job-related feedback.
  • The desire for further leadership development.

Ranking Method

This system requires raters to rank subordinates based on overall performance. Advantages include:

  • Employees are ranked according to their performance level.
  • It's easy to identify the best and worst performers.

Common Errors in Performance Appraisals

  • Contrast Effect
  • First Impression Error
  • Halo-Horn Effect
  • Similar-to-Me Effect
  • Central Tendency
  • Stereotyping

Conclusion

Harvard University separates appraisal methods into two types: traditional methods (emphasizing personality traits like initiative, creativity, and integrity) and modern methods (evaluating work results, which are more objective).

Entradas relacionadas: