Geophysical Survey Methods: Principles and Selection Criteria

Classified in Design and Engineering

Written on in English with a size of 2.39 KB

Physical Properties in Geophysical Surveys

Commonly used physical properties include:

  • Elastic wave velocity (elasticity, density): Seismic methods
  • Electric pulse velocity (dielectric constant): Georadar (GPR)
  • Electrical DC resistance (resistivity): DC resistivity methods
  • Electrical AC conductivity: EM conductivity methods
  • Magnetic field strength (susceptibility): Magnetic methods
  • Gravity field strength (density): Gravity methods

The value of surface measurements is determined by the contrast in the relevant property (material type) and the three-dimensional structure.

Selecting the Right Geophysical Method

When planning a survey, consider the following factors:

  • What type and shape of feature is being imaged?
  • Is an area or line survey more effective?
  • Which physical properties will show the best contrast?
  • Are there strong but irrelevant contrasts that will mask results?
  • To what depth must the survey penetrate?
  • What spatial resolution is required?
  • What are the time or cost constraints?
  • Are there special restrictions, such as access or potential damage?

Passive vs. Active Geophysical Methods

Passive methods are non-destructive and require less equipment. They are often based on anomalies in the strength of a potential field (e.g., magnetics), though results are inherently ambiguous.

Geophysical methods are further subdivided into contacting or non-contacting methods based on ground interaction:

  • Contacting methods:
    • Seismics
    • Electrical resistivity
  • Non-contacting methods:
    • Gravity
    • Magnetics
    • Ground penetrating radar
    • EM conductance methods

Common Challenges in Geophysical Data

Geophysical data typically face two generic problems:

  • Active methods: There is a trade-off between image resolution and depth of penetration.
  • Passive methods: There is an inherent ambiguity in field strength data, as a wide, shallow object can generate the same field anomaly as a compact, deeper object.

Related entries: