Notes, summaries, assignments, exams, and problems for Law & Jurisprudence

The Rule of Law in Democratic States

Diamond and Morlino highlight the rule of law as the cornerstone of any democratic state. A robust legal system prevents exploitation and protects citizens from government overreach. In states where the law is respected, citizens enjoy free and fair elections, participate in shaping laws and policies, and hold their government accountable. A law-abiding government, in turn, respects public opinion, protects equal rights for all, and remains answerable for any misconduct across its executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Conversely, without the rule of law, democratic institutions weaken, citizen participation diminishes, and corruption flourishes. Many developing nations struggle to establish a... Continue reading "Rule of Law and Sovereignty in Democratic States" »

Counterclaims in Legal Proceedings

Counterclaim: A claim asserted by the defendant against the plaintiff, serving as both a defense and a counter-attack. It involves the defendant's pleadings against the claimant, within their competence.

Requirements for a Counterclaim

• Connection between the defendant's pleadings and the plaintiff's initial claims.
• The Court must have jurisdiction over the subject matter and the counterclaim.
• The counterclaim is filed against the initial plaintiff.

Consequences of a Counterclaim

It is another claim within the same proceeding, discussed and judged alongside the original claim. The counterclaim defendant (original plaintiff) has the right to defend themselves.

Counterclaim Defenses

Types of allegations between the counterclaim... Continue reading "Counterclaims and Default Declarations in Legal Proceedings" »

Judicial Presumptions: Conclusive and Rebuttable

A judicial presumption is a logical inference made by a judge where, once a fact has been established, it is very likely that another fact is true. This is a type of circumstantial evidence, representing the mental activity of inferring the truth of one fact based on another.

It comprises three essential elements: an ascertained fact, a logical link, and a presumed fact. Courts are expected to apply presumptions during the evaluation of evidence.

Presumptions can be categorized into two main types:

• Legal Presumptions: Established directly in the text of the law, these may be either conclusive or rebuttable.
• Judicial Presumptions: Created ad hoc by the court in consideration of the specific circumstances

Understanding the Research Process

The process for a research paper involves interpreting the results of research and then proving or disproving a hypothesis.

Crafting Your Research Question

What are you interested in? What do you need to know about it?

Narrowing Down Research

To summarize, focus only on what is relevant to your topic.

Importance of Citing Sources

Citing sources gives you credibility and avoids legal issues and plagiarism.

Steps in the Research Process

1. Research Question
2. Background Information
3. Hypothesis
4. Design Experiment
5. Collect Data
6. Analyze Results
7. Publish Findings

Preparing for Research

The process needed to prepare for research involves:

• Define
• Explore
• Identify
• Relate

Information Processing Skills

Requirements to effectively process information:... Continue reading "Mastering the Research Process and Citation" »

Free and Legal Evaluation of Evidence

Free and legal evaluation is the mental activity by which the Judge decides which fact is true or false. The Judge shall interpret and then evaluate.

• Interpretation: To comprehend the meaning of evidentiary results. You can’t assess anything if you don’t understand the meaning of an evidentiary result; you need to understand in order to evaluate.
• Evaluation: Assuming the Judge has understood the objective meaning, to which rules should the Judge adhere, to decide if a fact is true or false?

The general rule is the free evaluation of the evidence; the Judge is free to choose the rule of logic.

Free evaluation is a system in which the Judge is left to choose among the rules of human criteria and reason. The... Continue reading "Understanding Evidence Evaluation in Legal Proceedings" »

Arguments For and Against Juries

Arguments in Favour of Juries

• They are democratic, ensuring trial by one’s peers.
• They allow for public participation.
• Jurors are not influenced by professional prejudice.
• Juries are a barrier to the enforcement of unpopular laws.
• Juries confer legitimacy on the criminal justice process.

Arguments Against Juries

• Juries are unrepresentative.
• Juries cannot cope with highly complex cases.
• Juries can be influenced by prejudice.
• Juries are too easily persuaded by rhetoric rather than facts.
• Juries may be dominated by a few individuals.
• Juries do not sufficiently know the law.

Different Types of Lawyers in the UK and the US

UK Legal Roles

• Solicitors
• Barristers

US Legal Roles

• Lawyers (attorneys, attorneys-at-law, counsels, counselors,

Mistakes in Procedendo and In Iudicando

In procedendo (mistakes committed before the judgement): when upholding an appeal, the Court finds a mistake before the First Instance judgement. The judgement upholding the appeal will order the case to be referred back to the Court of First Instance at the point where the mistake/procedural infringement occurred.

In iudicando (mistakes done when adjudicating): if the Court finds that the mistake was committed at the First Instance, it will rule on the matter of the case for a second time and substitute the judgement given by the First Instance Court.

The Court shall rule on the merits of the case.

Judgements Subject to Appeal in Cassation

There are strict limitations on what proceedings can be subject to... Continue reading "Procedural and Judgment Errors & Cassation Appeals" »

Legal Terminology

ARRAIGN OR BE ARRAIGNED: acusar o ser acusado, COUNSEL: consejo, COMBINED: conjunto, POTENTIALLY; TAXPAYERS: contribuyente, STATE: estado, RARELY; PAROLED: lib. condicional, ADDING: añadiendo, HEALTH; CARE: cuidado, INMATES: recluso, "TOUGH ON CRIME": difícil en el crimen, FULL; LESS: menos, WARMER: +calido, TURN OFF: apagar, TURN DOWN: rechazar, UNPLUG: desenchufar, THROW AWAY: tirar la basura, PUT ON: ponerse, MORE: mas, TAKE OFF: quitarse, TURN UP: aparecer, PLUG IN: enchufar, KEEP: guardar, COLDER: +frio, EMPTY: vacío, RELEASE: lanzamiento, ALLOWED: permitido, GUARANTEES: garantía, SPENT; AVAILABLE: disponible, LEAD: dirigir, DEEP: profundo, ARMED=ROBERRY: robo a mano armada, PAROLE BOAR: Junta de lib., TECHNICAL PROBLEM,... Continue reading "Legal Terminology and Criminal Justice System" »

History

• George Washington established a cabinet with four secretaries:
  • Secretary of State: Thomas Jefferson
  • Secretary of the Treasury: Alexander Hamilton
  • Secretary of War: Henry Knox
  • Attorney General: Edmund Randolph

National Level

• President: Head of State and Government, Commander in Chief.
• Vice President: Also elected by the people, serves as President of the Senate.
• Cabinet: Composed of 15 secretaries and the Vice President. Examples include the Secretary of State and the Secretary of the Treasury. All members are nominated by the President.

Agencies

• Secretaries of departments do not have rule-making power.
• US Agencies, on the other hand, have rule-making power.

Types of Agencies

1. Dependent Agencies: President → Cabinet → Agencies dependent on the

Administrative Decisions (Decision-Making Power)

Administrative decisions (decision-making power) are adopted by the administration (agencies, e.g., the EPA).

• Examples: fines; scholarship; penitentiary permits (probation); third decree; maternity licenses; concession; expropriation decision (possibility to take ownership from a citizen for the public good).

Administrative Adjudication

Administrative adjudication is a decision passed at the federal, state, or local level to resolve a conflict or a dispute between one citizen and the administration, or between citizens.

• Example: a conflict between two students over a scholarship; you may appeal an administrative decision to claim your scholarship.

Administrative decisions = actions. They are actions... Continue reading "Administrative Decisions and Acts in Spain: Law & Types" »