Zaha Hadid and the BMW Central Building: Accomplishment vs. Activity
Classified in Physics
Written on in English with a size of 2.26 KB
Zaha Hadid was designing the BMW Central Building.
The eventuality described in the VP ‘design the BMW Central Building” is [-static, +durative, +telic], thus an accomplishment. As shown in this example, it is compatible with the progressive, which emphasizes the progress of a [+durative] eventuality. Three diagnostics can be used to show that this event is an accomplishment, not an activity:
- It is compatible with in-PPs ('Zaha Hadid designed the BMW Central Building in three months.'), but not with for-PPs ('Zaha Hadid designed the BMW Central Building in three months').
- It does not have the sub-interval property: A subinterval of the event described in ‘Zaha Hadid designed the BMW Central Building’ cannot be described as ‘Zaha Hadid designed the BMW Central Building’.
- The imperfective does not entail the perfective: ‘Zaha Hadid was designing the BMW Central Building’ does NOT entail ‘Zaha Hadid designed the BMW Central Building’.
The policeman hit the screen a few times with the stylus.
The eventuality described in the VP ‘hit the screen’ is [-static, -durative, -telic], thus a semelfactive. Three diagnostics can be used to show that this event is a semelfactive:
- It is incompatible with in-PPs: #The policeman hit the screen in three minutes.
- It is compatible with for-PPs with an interpretation of duration of a series of iterated events: The policeman hit the screen for ten seconds.
- It is compatible with the progressive, which emphasizes the progress of several instances of the event.
My boyfriend is in London.
The eventuality described in the VP ‘be in London’ is [+static, +durative, -telic], thus a state. Two diagnostics can be used to show that this eventuality is a state:
- It is incompatible with the progressive: ‘#My boyfriend is being in London.’
- The present tense, as in this example, has a present time reading.
An additional property of this state is that it expresses a temporary property, i.e. it is a stage-level predicate which cannot co-occur with generic statements about classes of individuals (#Students are in London) and can co-occur with presentational there (There are many students in London).