Thomas Aquinas' Five Proofs for God's Existence
Classified in Philosophy and ethics
Written on in English with a size of 4.43 KB
Thomas Aquinas' Five Ways to God's Existence
Thomas Aquinas' demonstrations of the existence of God, famously known as "The Five Ways" (Quinque Viae), have profoundly influenced philosophical and theological thought. Aquinas deemed it necessary to prove God's existence because it is not immediately obvious to human reason. He asserted that such a demonstration is possible by observing the sensible world around us.
Aquinas did not accept the ontological argument proposed by Anselm of Canterbury, which relies solely on a priori reasoning and dispenses with empirical experience. While "The Five Ways" are presented as five distinct arguments in the Summa Theologica, only four appear in the Summa Contra Gentiles. The exact number, however, is less critical than their shared underlying structure.
Each of these ways begins with an observable aspect of reality—a "sensitive body" or empirical fact—such as movement, and then seeks its ultimate cause. The core premise is that a series of causes cannot extend infinitely. If it did, there would be no first cause, and consequently, no subsequent causes. Therefore, this causal chain must ultimately lead back to a first cause, which Aquinas identifies as God. This reasoning leads to the conclusion that God exists.
The Five Ways Explained
Following the order presented in the Summa Theologica, here are Aquinas' Five Ways:
1. The Way of Motion (Prime Mover)
This way begins with the observation that things in the world are in motion. Since everything that moves is moved by something else, the motion of a body points to an external cause. If this mover is itself moved by another, that leads us back to yet another mover. However, this series of movers cannot extend infinitely. Therefore, it is necessary to affirm the existence of a first, unmoved mover, which is itself not moved by anything. This unmoved mover is God.
2. The Way of Efficient Causality (Uncaused Cause)
The second way considers the order of efficient causes. In the world, we observe a sequence of causes and effects. Nothing can be the efficient cause of itself, as it would have to exist prior to itself, which is impossible. Just as with motion, the chain of efficient causes cannot go on infinitely. Thus, there must be a first efficient cause, an uncaused cause, which is God.
3. The Way of Contingency (Necessary Being)
This third way starts from the contingency of beings. We observe that things in the world come into existence and pass out of existence; they are contingent, meaning they do not have to exist. If everything were contingent, then at some point, nothing would have existed, and therefore, nothing would exist now. Since things do exist, there must be something that is not contingent but is necessary. This necessary being, whose existence is not dependent on anything else, is God.
4. The Way of Degrees of Perfection (Maximum Being)
The fourth way notes the varying degrees of perfection found in things. We speak of things being more or less good, true, noble, or perfect. These comparative terms imply a standard or maximum. For example, something is "hotter" because it approaches the maximum heat. Therefore, there must be something that is the cause of all perfections in other things, the maximum being in terms of truth, goodness, and nobility. This ultimate source of all perfection is God.
5. The Way of Teleology or Design (Supreme Director)
The fifth way begins by observing that natural bodies, even those without intelligence, act for an end or purpose. For instance, a stone falls downwards consistently. This purposeful behavior suggests an intelligent design. Things that lack intelligence cannot move towards an end unless directed by something intelligent. Therefore, there must be an intelligent being that directs all natural things to their ends. This Supreme Director of the Universe is God.
Underlying Principle: Essence and Existence
Underlying these pathways is the fundamental assertion that things do not exist by virtue of their own essence. Each entity is a specific "something that is," but its essence (what it is) does not inherently include its existence (that it is). This distinction implies that all contingent things must receive their existence from something else, ultimately leading back to a being whose essence is its existence—God.