Scientific Knowledge: Greco-Medieval and Modern Eras

Classified in Social sciences

Written at on English with a size of 4.02 KB.

Outline of Scientific Knowledge Through History

Greco-Medieval Era

Introduction

Philosophy was considered equivalent to Science and dealt with universal essences. Myth, on the other hand, was associated with *doxa*, representing multiple and changing appearances. The Middle Ages maintained a similar scheme, but with a theological basis.

The Universe: A Biological Model

  • The universe was seen as a living being, finite (limited) and ordered (a cosmos), and full of matter (not empty).
  • Qualitative Approach: Nature endowed each substance with potentialities determining its nature:
    • Plants: grow, survive, nurture, and reproduce.
    • Animals: feel, crave, and move.
    • Humans: think.
  • Geocentric and Geostatic: A heterogeneous view where celestial phenomena differed from terrestrial ones.
  • Sublunary (Earth and its surroundings): Composed of four elements with rectilinear movement.
  • Supralunar (Sun, Moon, planets, and the Unmoved Mover): Composed of ether with circular movement.
  • Natural phenomena were considered certain and followed two principles: causality (what exists or may exist) and conservation (of substance).

Scientific Knowledge

Objective: Theory explaining natural phenomena based on four causes:

  • Material (what it is made of)
  • Formal (its essence)
  • Efficient (what caused it)
  • Final (its purpose).

Method: Empirical:

  1. Observation of particular phenomena through the senses.
  2. Abstraction of universal concepts (essences) of things.
  3. Understanding of particular substances.

Modern Age

Introduction

Renaissance: A shift from Theocentrism to Anthropocentrism, focusing on natural reality instead of transcendental metaphysical reality. Key changes included:

  • Copernicus: Heliocentrism and the motion of the Earth.
  • Kepler: Elliptical orbits.
  • Galileo: Use of the telescope.

Enlightenment: Newton, considered the father of modern science, formulated the laws of gravity. Conclusion: Everything in nature is either matter or energy, existing within an infinite, three-dimensional Euclidean and absolute space, and an infinite, linear (not cyclical), and absolute time.

Philosophy and science became separate disciplines.

The Universe: A Mechanistic Model

  • Nature was viewed as a machine, a large artifact composed of matter and energy moving in space and time.
  • Quantitative Approach: Natural phenomena were explained not by their qualities, but by mathematical laws governing the course of nature. These laws were characterized by regularity, conservation, economy, and continuity.
  • Heliocentrism and the motion of the Earth.
  • Homogeneous: The same mathematical laws applied to both celestial bodies and terrestrial objects (e.g., the law of gravity).
  • Determinism: Natural processes could only happen in accordance with regularity, conservation, economy, and continuity.

Scientific Knowledge

Objective: To study, dominate, and transform nature to serve human needs. This involved explaining natural processes, distinct from philosophy's attempt to explain the "why" and "what."

Methods: Deductive and Inductive reasoning were used in formal sciences, empirical sciences, technology, and mathematics.

Entradas relacionadas: