Perception, Representation, and Symbolization Processes
Classified in Philosophy and ethics
Written on in English with a size of 3.85 KB
Perception
First-level process. Perception is the result of the combination of two cognitive processes: sensation and perception. The human mind collects information from the environment through the sense organs and gives it significance; its perception is the result (the perceived form or object is present in our minds).
- Characteristics: Requires the presence of a stimulus.
- From the data of the senses, perception occurs in a unique, practical space and time. It is direct, sharp, and exact, not amending its qualities.
Representation
Second-level process, involving memory and imagination. Memory allows us to retain information and replay it without the stimulus.
- Image result: Does not require a stimulus.
- Made from unique past perceptions and is concrete.
- Time is not tied to a specific space; it represents diffuse and modified qualities.
Symbolization
Third-level process. Symbolic thought and language processes allow us to rework information. The result is the concept (mental representations of the object in symbolic processes).
- Characteristics: Does not require the presence of the object or image in the mind.
- The object is presented in a universal way, i.e., all of the same class, and in an abstract way, with common features, and is presented as a symbol.
Formation of Concepts
Concepts are formed by:
- Abstraction: Extracting features.
- Symbolization: A symbol is invented to represent the concept.
- Generalization: Grouping all things that have these characteristics, represented by the same concept.
Process:
- Conventional: Selecting the character that we agree upon.
- Partial: Disregarding part of the object.
- Social: Made by linguistic communities.
Fallacies
A fallacy is an argument that seems well-reasoned but is actually misleading.
- Formal Fallacies: They are flawed by default.
- Informal Fallacies: They have a false defect in content.
Types of Fallacies:
- Fallacy of Ambiguity: Takes advantage of the double meaning of a word.
- Material Fallacy: Used by someone who knows less about an issue than we do.
- Ad Hominem Fallacy: Someone uses premises that do not serve our purpose on an issue that they dominate.
- Argumentum ad Populum: Tries to win popular approval without arguing with evidence.
- Argumentum ad Baculum: Hidden threat or catastrophic consequences.
- Argumentum ad Hominem: Tries to detract from what someone says by discrediting them.
- Offensive: The person is unreliable.
- Circumstantial: The person has an interest in what is being discussed.
- Argumentum ad Verecundiam: Uses an authority to gain credibility.
- Argumentum ad Ignorantiam: There is no sufficient evidence, or it could not be demonstrated.
- Argumentum Tu Quoque: Someone accuses you of having done something.
- Ex Populo: Most people do it or believe it.
- Complex Questions: Impounding the person by asking questions that are not very understandable.
- False Cause: Establishing relationships from a mere coincidence between two independent events.
- Circular Argument: The premises presuppose the conclusion.
Sophism
Sophisms are common in the media. They consciously manipulate or deceive, trying to present reasons without enthusiasm.