Key Concepts and Assumptions of Major International Relations Theories

Classified in Social sciences

Written on in English with a size of 4.24 KB

Classical Liberalism

  • Key Thinkers: Adam Smith, John Locke, David Ricardo, John Stuart Mill, Woodrow Wilson.
  • Core Assumptions: Objectivity is weak; the system is anarchic.
  • Game Theory: Positive-sum game; Prisoner's Dilemma leads to mutual and collective gains.
  • Key Actors (Institutions): Individuals, states, markets, International Governmental Organizations (IGOs), Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), and pressure groups.
  • Individual Preferences: Utilitarian and idealistic.
  • Intervening Variables: Non-state actors (political parties, markets, lobbies).
  • Explanatory/Predictive Scope: Normative international, foreign, and domestic policy.
  • Goals: Self-determination, cooperation, security, wealth, peace, and stability.
  • Key Concepts: Just War Theory, Collective Security, Wilsonian policies.
  • Examples: The League of Nations, The United Nations (UN).

Democratic Peace Theory

  • Key Thinkers: Immanuel Kant, Michael Doyle, Rudolph Rummel.
  • Core Assumptions: Objectivity is weak; the system is anarchic.
  • Game Theory: Positive-sum game; Prisoner's Dilemma leads to mutual and collective gains.
  • Key Actors: Individuals and states.
  • Constraints: Kantian constraints (democratic rule and form of government).
  • Intervening Variables: Other non-state actors (same as Classical Liberalism).
  • Explanatory/Predictive Scope: Normative international, foreign, and domestic politics.
  • Types of Peace: Dyadic and Monadic Democratic Peace.
  • Goals: Security, wealth, peace, and stability through the spread of liberal democracy.
  • Key Concepts: "Perpetual Peace," "End of History," "League of Democracies."
  • Examples: Peaceful relations between Britain and the US, and the US and Europe since the end of WWII.

Neo-Liberalism (Neo-Liberal Institutionalism)

  • Key Thinkers: Immanuel Kant (inspiration), Robert Keohane, Joseph Nye, Milton Friedman.
  • Core Assumptions: Objectivity is weak; the system is anarchic.
  • Differences from Democratic Peace Theory:
    • Key Actors: States, markets, and IGOs.
    • Focus Areas: Trade, complex interdependence, and regime theory.
    • Mechanisms: Market economics and international institutions are central.
  • Key Concepts: "Dell Theory," "Golden Arches Theory."
  • Examples: Peaceful relations between the US and Europe since the end of WWII, the spread of NATO and the European Union (EU).

The English School (International Society)

  • Key Thinkers: Hugo Grotius (Just War), Robert Jackson, Hedley Bull.
  • Core Assumptions: Objectivity is weak; existence of an International Society.
  • Game Theory: Limited positive-sum game.
  • Driving Forces: Systemic pressures and societal cohesion.
  • Key Actors: States, International Society, and World Society.
  • System Structure: Anarchy tempered by social cohesion.
  • Intervening Variables: Ethics, values, and norms.
  • Explanatory/Predictive Scope: Normative, lacking a rigorous theoretical framework.
  • Security Focus: State and societal security, alongside World Society's normative action.
  • Key Debates:
    • Pluralism (communitarian order) vs. Solidarity (transitional and humanitarian concern).
    • Traditional sovereignty vs. Sovereignty as Responsibility to Protect (R2P).
  • Example: Debates surrounding Article 2.7 of the UN Charter during the Cold War (referencing the Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China).

Related entries: