Empiricist Thinkers: Bacon, Locke, Berkeley, and Hume's Ideas

Francis Bacon (1561-1626)

Francis Bacon, a political philosopher with interests in alchemy, science, and politics, wrote The New Organon (or "new body of work"), which seeks to establish the utility of things. To overcome nature, one must first obey it. He famously stated, "Knowledge is power," emphasizing technical progress and utility.

Conditions for Progress

Bacon outlined several conditions for scientific progress:

• Empirical experience: Relying on observation and sensory data.
• Methodical approach: This includes:
  • Using tables for organizing data.
  • Meticulous record-keeping.
  • Precise measurement.
  • Systematic experimentation.
  • Employing induction to arrive at general ideas, as opposed to pure deduction. He distinguished between simple enumeration and true induction (which involves elimination and comparison).

Barriers to Knowledge: The Idols

Bacon identified four main categories of 'Idols' or fallacies that hinder human understanding:

Idols of the Tribe (Idola Tribus)

These are inherent tendencies of human nature, such as the inclination to perceive more order and regularity in phenomena than actually exists, or to be swayed by what is striking. Beliefs accepted by all people are not necessarily true due to these shared human limitations.

Idols of the Cave (Idola Specus)

These are individual biases and prejudices stemming from one's personal upbringing, education, experiences, and disposition. Each person has their own 'cave' that distorts their perception of reality.

Idols of the Marketplace (Idola Fori)

These arise from the imperfections and ambiguities of language. Words can be misleading, and their common usage can distort understanding, leading to confusion and empty controversies.

Idols of the Theater (Idola Theatri)

These are fallacies stemming from accepted philosophical systems, dogmas, and erroneous methods of demonstration. These systems are like stage plays, presenting fictional worlds that do not conform to true knowledge derived from experience.

John Locke: Empiricism (1632-1704)

John Locke addressed the question: What is known and how do we come to know it? He argued that all ideas originate from experience, directly challenging René Descartes' theory of innate ideas.

According to Locke, the mind is a tabula rasa (blank slate) at birth, and knowledge is built through experience. He identified two sources of ideas:

• Sensation (Passive): Ideas derived from external sensory experiences (e.g., seeing yellow, feeling warmth).
• Reflection (Active): Ideas derived from the mind's own operations (e.g., thinking, doubting, believing), as it processes the ideas gained from sensation.

Locke also distinguished between qualities of objects:

• Primary Qualities: Objective properties inherent in objects themselves, such as extension, solidity, number, and shape. These qualities exist whether or not they are perceived.
• Secondary Qualities: Subjective properties that are not in the objects themselves but are powers in objects to produce sensations in us, such as color, odor, texture, and taste. These depend on perception.

Simple ideas are the basic, unanalyzable 'atoms' of perception received passively through sensation or reflection. Complex ideas (e.g., 'mammal,' 'life,' 'justice') are formed by the mind actively combining, comparing, or abstracting from simple ideas through study and reflection.

George Berkeley (1685-1753)

George Berkeley's central philosophical tenet is summarized by the Latin phrase 'Esse est percipi' – 'To be is to be perceived.' We have experiences of objects, but his philosophy questions whether these objects exist independently of perception.

If existence depends on perception, what happens to objects when no human mind is perceiving them? Berkeley argued that the continuous existence of the world is guaranteed by an all-perceiving mind, namely God. Thus, reality consists of:

• Individual consciousnesses (minds or spirits) and their perceptions.
• The ideas perceived by these minds.
• God, whose perception sustains the existence of things.

How do we know the truth? For Berkeley, truth lies in the consistent and orderly ideas imprinted on our senses by God, and through the intellectual understanding of these perceptions as part of a divinely ordered reality. It is through the pure perception of our reality, as orchestrated by God, that we access truth.

David Hume (1711-1766)

David Hume, a Scottish philosopher, further developed empiricism, asserting that all knowledge ultimately depends on experience. We derive our understanding from two types of mental perceptions:

• Impressions: Vivid and direct sensations, emotions, and experiences (e.g., seeing red, feeling anger).
• Ideas: Fainter copies or reflections of impressions (e.g., thinking about red, remembering anger).

For Hume, any idea is only meaningful or valid if it can be traced back to a corresponding impression. He was skeptical of concepts that could not be empirically verified, such as the traditional notion of God or a persistent, unified self ('I' or 'ego'). He famously described the mind as a 'theater' where various perceptions successively make their appearance, pass, re-pass, glide away, and mingle in an infinite variety of postures and situations. There is no concrete, enduring self beyond this stream of impressions; the 'ego' is a conceptual construct. He also questioned the traditional understanding of the 'Order of Nature,' particularly if it implied a divinely ordained design.

Hume on Causality and Induction

Hume critically analyzed the concept of causality (the relationship where A causes B). He argued that our belief in causality is not based on reason or direct observation of a necessary connection, but on experience and custom. When we observe A followed by B repeatedly, we identify:

• Contiguity: A and B occur close together in space and time.
• Temporal Succession: A consistently precedes B.
• Constant Conjunction: We observe this pattern repeatedly.

From these observations, we infer a 'necessary connection' between A and B, but this connection itself is never directly perceived. It is a feeling or expectation developed through habit (custom). This leads to his analysis of induction: we observe a limited number of cases and then generalize to a universal rule (amplifying induction). Hume pointed out that while induction is psychologically necessary for us to navigate the world, it lacks logical justification; experience of the past does not logically guarantee the future will be the same. The 'Order of Nature' is thus an assumption based on past regularities, not a provable certainty.