Lifting the Corporate Veil: Legal Principles and Case Law
Insolvency Act 1986: Director Liability
Section 213: Fraudulent Trading
If it can be established that a director committed an act of fraud beyond reasonable doubt, the court may lift the corporate veil and hold the director personally responsible.
Section 214: Wrongful (Negligent) Trading
If a director fails to take appropriate steps to minimize potential loss to creditors when the company is insolvent, they may be held liable on the balance of probabilities.
Corporate Veil and Parent-Subsidiary Relations
Key Legal Precedents
- Re Produce Marketing Consortium Ltd (No. 2): These principles have been extended to parent-subsidiary and multinational company structures.
- DHN Food Distributors Ltd v Tower Hamlets LBC (1976): Lord Denning held that subsidiaries