Rousseau's Social Contract and the General Will
Rousseau's Critique of Hobbes and Locke
In his political thought, Jean-Jacques Rousseau identifies two fundamental shortcomings in the social contract theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke:
- Regarding Hobbes: Rousseau finds that his form of contract—the contract of submission—denies the natural freedom of man and neither establishes nor allows for civil and political liberties.
- Regarding Locke: Rousseau seeks a contract far more radical, in which man receives civil liberty along with all its rights.
In effect, according to Rousseau, the "natural" man has no true freedom or liberty before their partnership in the State. However, Rousseau famously states, "Man is born free, and everywhere is in chains." How has such a change been produced?